WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "6162dd40-d8c5-4ed0-b4f9-c3e11bd806a4"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 30, "id": "239", "owners": [30], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "239"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nichibun.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000239", "sets": []}, "author_link": ["441", "441"], "item_1687303740024": {"attribute_name": "編者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"contributorNames": [{"contributorName": "BAXTER, James C.", "lang": "en"}], "contributorType": "Editor"}]}, "item_5_alternative_title_20": {"attribute_name": "その他の言語のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "「パル判決」再考 : 戦後日本の受容の系譜を顧みる", "subitem_alternative_title_language": "ja"}]}, "item_5_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2007-01-01", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "224", "bibliographicPageStart": "215", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "19", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "Nichibunken Japan review : journal of the International Research Center for Japanese Studies", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_5_description_15": {"attribute_name": "フォーマット", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "application/pdf", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_5_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Nearly six decades have passed since the International Military Tribunal for the Far East handed down its judgment, in which all the defendants were found guilty of one or more of the charges. Six out of the eleven judges submitted separate opinions, among which was the Indian justice Radhabinod Pal’s totally dissentient one. Pal did not in the least affirm all of Japan’s past actions; he simply held that the defendants’ actions were not illegal in an indictable sense. And yet, inasmuch as the prewar and wartime picture of Japan painted by the official verdict came as a shock to the Japanese in the wake of World War Two, Pal’s opinion was interpreted as another “judgment” delivered by an Asian judge and functioned as an alternative or a strong antidote for the view of the history generated by the tribunal. That is, whether approving of or refuting his opinion, one has referred to Pal’s view as none other than “the argument for Japan’s innocence.” This essay will attempt to dissect how the post-war Japan has responded to Pal’s opinion and discuss the significance of the opinion in the context of Japanese intellectual history.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_5_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "441", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}, {"nameIdentifier": "60287901", "nameIdentifierScheme": "e-Rad", "nameIdentifierURI": "https://nrid.nii.ac.jp/ja/search/?qm=60287901"}], "names": [{"name": "牛村, 圭", "nameLang": "ja"}]}]}, "item_5_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.15055/00000233", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_5_publisher_33": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "International Research Center for Japanese Studies", "subitem_publisher_language": "en"}]}, "item_5_source_id_10": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA10759175", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_5_source_id_8": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "09150986", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}, {"subitem_source_identifier": "24343129", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "EISSN"}]}, "item_5_text_62": {"attribute_name": "特集号タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_language": "en", "subitem_text_value": "Twentieth Anniversary of the Founding of the International Research Center for Japanese Studies"}]}, "item_5_version_type_16": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "USHIMURA, Kei", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "441", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}, {"nameIdentifier": "60287901", "nameIdentifierScheme": "e-Rad", "nameIdentifierURI": "https://nrid.nii.ac.jp/ja/search/?qm=60287901"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2015-11-11"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "JN1907.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "183.4 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 183400.0, "url": {"label": "JN1907.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nichibun.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/239/files/JN1907.pdf"}, "version_id": "2e295de2-1680-4e02-b632-2f416a2a0938"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL FOR THE FAR EAST", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "TOKYO WAR CRIMES TRIAL", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "RADHABINOD PAL", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "SEPARATE OPINIONS OF IMTFE", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "PAL’S DISSENTIENT JUDGMENT", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "THE ARGUMENT FOR JAPAN’S INNOCENCE", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "JAPANESE INTELLECTUAL HISTORY", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "POSTWAR JAPAN", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "\u003cRESEARCH NOTES\u003ePal’s “Dissentient Judgment” Reconsidered : Some Notes on Postwar Japan’s Responses to the Opinion", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "\u003cRESEARCH NOTES\u003ePal’s “Dissentient Judgment” Reconsidered : Some Notes on Postwar Japan’s Responses to the Opinion", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "5", "owner": "30", "path": ["173"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.15055/00000233", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2012-03-10"}, "publish_date": "2012-03-10", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "239", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["\u003cRESEARCH NOTES\u003ePal’s “Dissentient Judgment” Reconsidered : Some Notes on Postwar Japan’s Responses to the Opinion"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
<RESEARCH NOTES>Pal’s “Dissentient Judgment” Reconsidered : Some Notes on Postwar Japan’s Responses to the Opinion
https://doi.org/10.15055/00000233
https://doi.org/10.15055/00000233e3e3af44-819a-49eb-8f20-41cb1d26c9d8
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
JN1907.pdf (183.4 kB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2012-03-10 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | <RESEARCH NOTES>Pal’s “Dissentient Judgment” Reconsidered : Some Notes on Postwar Japan’s Responses to the Opinion | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15055/00000233 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
著者 |
USHIMURA, Kei
× USHIMURA, Kei |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
識別子 | 441 | |||||
識別子Scheme | e-Rad | |||||
識別子URI | https://nrid.nii.ac.jp/ja/search/?qm=60287901 | |||||
識別子 | 60287901 | |||||
姓名 | 牛村, 圭 | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Nearly six decades have passed since the International Military Tribunal for the Far East handed down its judgment, in which all the defendants were found guilty of one or more of the charges. Six out of the eleven judges submitted separate opinions, among which was the Indian justice Radhabinod Pal’s totally dissentient one. Pal did not in the least affirm all of Japan’s past actions; he simply held that the defendants’ actions were not illegal in an indictable sense. And yet, inasmuch as the prewar and wartime picture of Japan painted by the official verdict came as a shock to the Japanese in the wake of World War Two, Pal’s opinion was interpreted as another “judgment” delivered by an Asian judge and functioned as an alternative or a strong antidote for the view of the history generated by the tribunal. That is, whether approving of or refuting his opinion, one has referred to Pal’s view as none other than “the argument for Japan’s innocence.” This essay will attempt to dissect how the post-war Japan has responded to Pal’s opinion and discuss the significance of the opinion in the context of Japanese intellectual history. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
書誌情報 |
en : Nichibunken Japan review : journal of the International Research Center for Japanese Studies 巻 19, p. 215-224, 発行日 2007-01-01 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 09150986 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | EISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 24343129 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA10759175 | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
その他の言語のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | 「パル判決」再考 : 戦後日本の受容の系譜を顧みる | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
出版者 | International Research Center for Japanese Studies | |||||
編者 | ||||||
寄与者タイプ | Editor | |||||
姓名 | BAXTER, James C. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL FOR THE FAR EAST | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | TOKYO WAR CRIMES TRIAL | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | RADHABINOD PAL | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | SEPARATE OPINIONS OF IMTFE | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | PAL’S DISSENTIENT JUDGMENT | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | THE ARGUMENT FOR JAPAN’S INNOCENCE | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | JAPANESE INTELLECTUAL HISTORY | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | POSTWAR JAPAN | |||||
特集号タイトル | ||||||
en | ||||||
Twentieth Anniversary of the Founding of the International Research Center for Japanese Studies |